|
|
Post by icesk8monkey on Aug 2, 2005 20:37:41 GMT -5
im quiet well aware its not a real hocrux. but everyone is saying harry needs to destory the locket horcrux, when apparently RAB already intended to destroy it, so it is prob already destoryed. where in the following quotes does it say i think harry had a real horcrux?  ?? "i dont think r.a.b. is regulus. he seems a bit dumb to me from the way they mention him. not dumb that way but not exactly bright enough to find the location of the lock and stuff. probably a new character. and if he said on the note that he intends to destroy it, wouldnt it be destroyed then? so the locket in grimmauld is just a locket, not a horcrux anymore if it was in the first place" |
|
|
|
Post by Ana on Aug 4, 2005 16:23:25 GMT -5
ok, maybe we all got a little confused.
|
|
|
|
Post by death... you need a life on Aug 6, 2005 7:28:08 GMT -5
Well, I think (no matter how dumb he is) that Regulus Black is R.A.B. We never learned his middle name to know if his middle initial is A and he was a follower of Voldermort. It's quite possible he simply overheard someone who mentioned the locket and it's whereabouts. And maybe Voldermort found out that he overheard and had him killed. There are loads of possibilities. If it's not Regulus, it could simply be a nickname or a new character.
|
|
adam
Muggle
Posts: 34
|
Post by adam on Aug 8, 2005 15:42:25 GMT -5
i think kretcher could have it
|
|
adam
Muggle
Posts: 34
|
Post by adam on Aug 8, 2005 15:43:03 GMT -5
i think kretcher could have it
|
|
|
|
Post by Ana on Aug 9, 2005 17:10:56 GMT -5
ok, whoever has it, i dont' care cuz it's no longer a horcrux!! regulus(or whoever) destroyed the soul part of it, so now it's just a locket. i doubt it's a new character-there won't be a lot of new people in the last book.
|
|
|
|
Post by none on Aug 9, 2005 17:57:44 GMT -5
Did the books ever mention how Regulus died?
|
|
|
|
Post by icesk8monkey on Aug 9, 2005 18:51:11 GMT -5
nope, on voldies orders though
|
|
|
|
Post by icesk8monkey on Aug 9, 2005 18:53:45 GMT -5
ok, whoever has it, i dont' care cuz it's no longer a horcrux!! regulus(or whoever) destroyed the soul part of it, so now it's just a locket. ana, you said that a few posts ago, but in the beginning you said this : ........so he couldn't destroyed the horcrux. (talking about RAB) something wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by death... you need a life on Aug 9, 2005 20:22:52 GMT -5
well he might not have gotten a chance to destroy it.. it could still be a horcrux. it only says that he intended to destroy it. he might have died before he actually completed the task
|
|
|
|
Post by Ana on Aug 10, 2005 20:34:40 GMT -5
yes i realize that. well, we'll see.
|
|
|
|
Post by none on Aug 13, 2005 11:41:55 GMT -5
well if regulus died on voldemort's orders, than maybe voldemort was on to him or something, but he wasn't sure so he had someone else kill him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ana on Aug 13, 2005 20:50:29 GMT -5
exactly, like voldemort knew he destroyed the horcurx and wanted to kill him but he was already dead or something?
|
|
|
|
Post by death... you need a life on Aug 20, 2005 13:33:38 GMT -5
idk i think its still a horcrux. i dont think he got the chance to destroy the soul within if it is regulus.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ana on Aug 21, 2005 17:40:36 GMT -5
why not?
|
|
??
